The performance of SRQ was improved to be identical to regular QP in the latest FW release for all devices.
Tziporet
-----Original Message-----
From: Galen M. Shipman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 5:57 PM
To: Or Gerlitz
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Shared Receive Queue
I am using our own software which uses send receive in both cases. As
I said the code paths are exactly the same except for posting of
receive descriptors as well as initialization.
- Galen
On Jul 26, 2005, at 8:49 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> We have software which uses the mellanox shared receive queue and we
>> are seeing a substantial performance penalty (on the order of 4-5
>> usec on 0 byte messages).
>>
>
> Are you comparing code that sends short messages either by rdma write
> where the
> reciever does polling on memory (as done in some IB MPIs "short
> message
> protocols")
> to code that uses send/recv with SRQ --or-- code that does send/recv
> where in one run
> the recv is to "non shared" queue (that is regular QP) and in the
> other
> run to SRQ (QP attached to SRQ)?
>
> Or.
>
>
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
