On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Guy German wrote:
Hi James,
Hi Guy,
This patch has been garbled too. See below:
I will resend all the garbled patches sunday morning
- ps_ptr->bpool = DT_BpoolAlloc (NULL,
Something is missing here. If you remove the line above you can't
replace it with the line below...
+ + if (!(pt_ptr = DT_Alloc_Per_Test_Data (phead)))
...which has a double +
Why not ?
I replaced the first line :
- ps_ptr->bpool = DT_BpoolAlloc (NULL,
with :
+ if (!(pt_ptr = DT_Alloc_Per_Test_Data (phead)))
+ goto server_exit;
+ DT_MemListInit (pt_ptr);
+ memcpy ( (void *) (uintptr_t) &pt_ptr->Params,
+ (const void *) params_ptr,
+ sizeof (Params_t));
+ ps_ptr->bpool = DT_BpoolAlloc (pt_ptr,
What I basically did was allocating pt_ptr and
copying the params to the ds before calling DT_BpoolAlloc.
This time I call it with pt_ptr instead of NULL (that leads
to default use of physical memory registration).
(The + + has probably to do with mailer/diff problems)
I'll go through it again when you resend it.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
