Ok. I reference the x86_64 build problem in my log message and committed it in revision 2940.
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
I saw this on x86_64. Don't know about IA64. -- Hal -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of James Lentini Sent: Mon 8/1/2005 1:39 PM To: Arlin Davis Cc: openib Subject: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] uDAPL dapltest Where was the build problem being seen? x86_64 or IA64? I want to record it in the checkin log message. james On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Arlin Davis wrote:James, Patch to fix build problem. -arlin Signed-off by: Arlin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: dapltest/test/dapl_bpool.c =================================================================== --- dapltest/test/dapl_bpool.c (revision 2930) +++ dapltest/test/dapl_bpool.c (working copy) @@ -363,8 +363,8 @@ "BPOOL alloc_size %x\n", (int) bpool_ptr->alloc_size); DT_Tdep_PT_Printf (phead, - "BPOOL pz_handle %x\n", - (int) bpool_ptr->pz_handle); + "BPOOL pz_handle %p\n", + bpool_ptr->pz_handle); DT_Tdep_PT_Printf (phead, "BPOOL num_segs %x\n", (int) bpool_ptr->num_segs);_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
