On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 18:23, John Partridge wrote:
Hal/James,
Here is a patch that fixes the ia64 build problem and the warnings I had
previously posted.
The patch ONLY fixes the problems in the trunk tree ( apply from the trunk
subdir) and NOT
in users/jlentini,
I believe that users/jlentini is now obsolete and the trunk supercedes
this so this is fine.
the following files also need to be fixed (should be easy enough for
James to hack the patch file to do it) :-
users/jlentini/linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl_openib_cm.c
users/jlentini/linux-kernel/dat-provider/dapl_util.h
The patch is based on svn revision 2935 (copy also attached to email)
=================== patch begin ==============================
--- src/linux-kernel/infiniband/ulp/kdapl/ib/dapl_openib_cm.c 2005-07-26
00:00:10.000000000 -0500
+++ src/linux-kernel/infiniband/ulp/kdapl/ib/dapl_openib_cm.c 2005-08-01
11:56:25.240418715 -0500
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
&cm_ctx->dapl_comp);
if (status) {
printk(KERN_ERR "dapl_path_comp_handler: "
- "ib_at_paths_by_route returned %d id %lld\n",
+ "ib_at_paths_by_route returned %d id %lu\n",
status, cm_ctx->dapl_comp.req_id);
event = DAT_CONNECTION_EVENT_BROKEN;
goto error;
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@
&cm_ctx->dapl_comp);
if (status) {
printk(KERN_ERR "dapl_rt_comp_handler: ib_at_paths_by_route "
- "returned %d id %lld\n", status,
cm_ctx->dapl_comp.req_id);
+ "returned %d id %lu\n", status,
cm_ctx->dapl_comp.req_id);
event = DAT_CONNECTION_EVENT_BROKEN;
goto error;
This change yields the same warnings on x86_64 that you previously
indicated and this fixes on ia64 :-(
Should we use %Lu for printing out the req_id (a u64)?
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
