On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 20:30 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> >This is almost exactly what is there now. Not really a change. I don't
> >like
> > the multiple indirections to get to the function table, but this can be
> > simplified later.
>
> Indeed, it can be simplified a little, but why not having this simplification
> in the kdapl
> registry level ("dat") as it is in ib_core calling ib_verbs and libibverbs
> calling libmthca,
> while the verbs consumer does not have to go into those indirections at all
> but rather
> just call a well understood/defined api? are you suggesting to apply such a
> chance also
> to the verbs?I don't understand what you mean? What change would happen in verbs? -tduffy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
