On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 13:06, Tom Duffy wrote: > On 05 Aug 2005 11:42:17 -0400, Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to get comments on this prior to sending this over to > > kernel land. > > > --- net/packet/af_packet.c.orig 2005-06-29 19:00:53.000000000 -0400 > > +++ net/packet/af_packet.c 2005-08-05 11:23:24.000000000 -0400 > > @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ dev->hard_header == NULL (ll header is a > > mac.raw -> data > > data -> data > > > > - We should set nh.raw on output to correct posistion, > > + We should set nh.raw on output to correct position, > > packet classifier depends on it. > > */ > > > > @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static int packet_sendmsg_spkt(struct ki > > struct net_device *dev; > > unsigned short proto=0; > > int err; > > - > > + > > /* > > * Get and verify the address. > > */ > > Both of these are whitespace changes that shouldn't be sent with this patch.
The latter is but is removing the whitespace. Should that not be done ? The former is a commentary typo. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
