Hal wrote:
> >
> > I think that we should fix this and do it the "Auto tools" way.
> >
> > Please approve and I will provide a patch for using the macro.
>
> Yes, that is a better way and I would accept such a patch.
[EZ] But now when we know the include is not residing under prefix but forced under /usr/local it does not make much sense to do it.
Why do we keep the bin lib and include under different directory hierarchy?
It contradicts with the way most other user level things looks like in Linux.
Normally people place them all under prefix dir and let the user play with the prefix.
>
> >
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
