On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 14:12, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > > 3. Move osm includes into prefix (/usr/local/ib) > > > > but all the includes go into /usr/local/include/infiniband. There > are 4 > > subdirectories there for OpenSM related includes: complib, iba, > opensm, > > and vendor. > > [EZ] So the path /usr/local/include/infiniband is not relative to the > user defined prefix?
The prefix was for the libraries and binaries but not the includes. > This is a little hard coded. Can we say maybe that if one wants to > place the include under /usr/local/include then the bin should be > placed under /usr/local/bin ? I thought the proposal was to ditch the prefix totally and just use /usr/local/bin for binaries, usr/local/lib for libraries, and /usr/local/include/infiniband for the includes (I am assuming that the subdirectories will be maintained under that for opensm, vendor, iba, and complib). > Why do we need to invent a new concept where the include and bin use a > different prefix? > > [EZ] Will it be OK if the include will be placed under prefix/include > and will be linked to the proper subdirectory of > /usr/local/include/infiniband ? I thought the whole prefix thing was being removed so this shouldn't be necessary. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
