On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Guy German wrote:
> Hi, > > Just a small add to my reply about: > > > The approach taken in the current implementation is to always enable > > the IB upcalls and determine in the DAPL provider if the consumer's > > upcall should be invoked. > > My earlier reply was referring to part that the DAPL provider would > determine if the consumer's upcall should be invoked, instead of the > consumer deciding it. > As to always enabling the IB upcalls - that can be done. But if we do > it we should add the DTO events to the pending events list, which > brings us to the size of this list, that is in the current implementation > problematic. I like your approach of only enabling the CQ upcall when the consumer enables DAPL upcalls. I think we should continue in that direction. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
