On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:18:23AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 07:43:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > ... > > > The same as last time, the code didn't change at all. It's still > > > totally ignorant about such essential things as dma mapping, has > > > creative new abuse for struct iovec, it's still based on iovecs, > > > > "... still based on kdapl" of course > > Yeah, I was wondering about that. When I was off on vacation > in July (and OLS), kDAPL was committed to the svn repository. > Has anyone reviewed that?
We agreed that that James can commit it, but that doesn't mean it'll go anywhere. kDAPL is a dead end except for maybe out of tree vendor code. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
