Isn't this inevitable regardless of whether or not we have a tranport independent connection API. I thought ATS was required by NFS for authentication/authorization. Sorry in advance if I'm confused --- again.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Dreier > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:27 PM > To: James Lentini > Cc: Caitlin Bestler; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [openib-general] RDMA connection and address > translation API > > James> I agree with Caitlin. The eventual solution cannot force > James> protocol modifications in ULPs. > > Does this mean we're stuck with the current use of ATS in NFS-RDMA? > Surely there's still time to fix the protocol. > > - R. > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
