On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Roland Dreier wrote:
> James> I agree with Caitlin. The eventual solution cannot force > James> protocol modifications in ULPs. > > Does this mean we're stuck with the current use of ATS in NFS-RDMA? NFS-RDMA requires that the lower layer provide IP addressing. ATS is one proposal and the only one being documented and standardized in a standards organization. Any other solution that was documented and standardized should be considered. Since this will involve the wire protocol, it can't be OpenIB specific. > Surely there's still time to fix the protocol. I believe that a solution can be found without impacting the NFS-RDMA specifications. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
