>> typedef void (*ib_cma_ac_handler)(enum ib_cma_event event, void *context); >> typedef void (*ib_cma_event_handler)(enum ib_cma_event event, void *context, >> void *private_data); >>>Would ib_cma_conn_handler be more appropriate? > >Maybe, but it is actually the active side event cb (also for discon etc.) >I don't mind changing it, though...
Event handler sounds right to me. >> int ib_cma_connect(struct ib_cma_conn *cma_conn, >> union ib_cma_id *cma_id); >> >>> Should there be a way to cancel an ib_cma_connect() call? > >It is possible to add it. Not sure how much it will be used by >consumers, though. We can use the destroy cma_id call to cancel the connection. - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
