On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Guy German wrote:
> > typedef void (*ib_cma_event_handler)(enum ib_cma_event event, void *context, > > void *private_data); > >>Would ib_cma_conn_handler be more appropriate? > > Maybe, but it is actually the active side event cb (also for discon etc.) > I don't mind changing it, though... In that case, I would not change it. > > int ib_cma_connect(struct ib_cma_conn *cma_conn, > > union ib_cma_id *cma_id); > > > >> Should there be a way to cancel an ib_cma_connect() call? > > It is possible to add it. Not sure how much it will be used by > consumers, though. The additional synchonization needed in consumers isn't worth it. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
