Quoting Caitlin Bestler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > APM might be one good reason to want to get more than one > > path, would it not? > > But you would have to define automatic path migration in > generic/transport neutral terms. I've actually come up with
I dont see a problem. For the sake of this argument, lets assume APM cant be done with iWARP. How is an iWARP card different from an HCA on a fabric where there's only a single path to a specific node then? I dont have the IB spec in front of me now - is APM support optional or required in IB? > If APM can only be defined for IB then it does not have > to be addressed in the generic interface. I dont see how you can layer this on top without support for reporting multiple paths, so it will need to be addressed as part of this module. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
