Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 11:17, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 11:04, Eitan Zahavi wrote:
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
[same patch just generated with diff -up]
OpenSM: OpenIB vendor layer: Implement osm_vendor_delete
[I've done some testing of this; are there any regressions for this ?]
OpenSM call osm_vendor_delete during osm_opensm_destroy.
It is invoked during exit.
Actually, it should have said "Implement osm_vendor_unbind" rather than
delete.
Well the semantics are very old. We stick to the old osm_vendor_api.h. Maybe we
should not have.
But now we have too much depending on this API that I urge you not to modify it
if possible.
I didn't change the semantics. I implemented the OpenIB version. Recall
that Yael had indicated this was needed when she started on the 1.8.0
merge work.
I did not mean that. I thought you proposed to rename osm_opensm_destroy
osm_vendor_unbind
but now I'm not sure this is what you meant. My comment was about renaming.
I think I have to go home... so I do not waste your time not being able to read
right.
I'll probably login in 2 hours or so.
-- Hal
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
