Quoting r. Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: Re: ibv_get_async_event > > Sean Hefty wrote: > >I think that this would work well. I will update the uCM put event to > >match. > > After looking at the uCM more, changing from it's current model of > put_event to ack_events would require changes to the get_event, which > requires changes to the ib_cm_event structure. I think that having > matching event models across IB interfaces is ideal, but it requires > re-working a fair portion of the uCM event processing. How important do > others feel that this is?
I dont think its too important: I think Roland added multiple events as a performance optimization for completion events. CM speed isnt that critical a data path IMO to really need such an optimization. -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
