On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:13 -0700, Fab Tillier wrote: > > From: Ryan, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:07 AM > > > > My recollection is Matt Leininger, could be wrong > > I believe that Matt was just the messenger, conveying his organization's > position on the matter. Whether or not we agree with that position is > immaterial - it is Sandia's prerogative.
My position was we should use the same code in the Linux stack for the windows stack. MS and some openib members didn't seem to like that even though the code was dual licensed GPL/BSD. Speculation, fear, and uncertainty about MS also lead to the idea of having a separate code repository to show MS that there was a clear separate between the openib linux and windows code. I always preferred to do something reasonable. Don't blame me for the strange MS requirements. - Matt > > There was a need to have a separate repository independent of hosting issues. > > - Fab > > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
