On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 06:46, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 06:33, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > > > >>>Is this what you are referring to ? > >> > >>Yes the line of interest is: > >>__osmv_sa_mad_rcv_cb: Count = 7 = 800 / 112 (16) > >>This shows 16byte extra in the data size. > > > > > > Should it be 20 for the SA class header size or 0 here ? > Should be 0. Means an the packet size should accommodate an integer number of > SA records (after removing the headers size).
OK. There's a problem or problems on the receive side (of RMPP) to look into but these appear OK for SA client right now. > >>>I do also see: > >>>Sep 20 05:16:40 995667 [AB001140] -> osmt_get_service_by_name: ERR > > > > 0370: > > > >>>ib_query failed (IB_REMOTE_ERROR). > >>>Sep 20 05:16:40 995673 [AB001140] -> osmt_get_service_by_name: > > > > Remote > > > >>>error = IB_SA_MAD_STATUS_NO_RECORDS. > >>>Sep 20 05:16:40 995678 [AB001140] -> osmt_get_service_by_name: > > > > Expected > > > >>>num of records is : 1, Found number of records : 0 > >> > >>The full osmtest flow has some intentional errors injected. > >>If it provides the "PASSED" message at the end it means that > >>the errors were intentional and expected. > >> > >>Some of the flows have a special output message that wraps the > >>errors in a section like: > >> > >>"vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv" > >>... > >>"^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^" > >> > >>We probably need to apply this convention to all the "bad flows". > > > > > > Then is expected number of records in this test 1 rather than 0 ? Will these be fixed ? Are these issues being documented along with other ones previously noted ? -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
