On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Guy German wrote:
> enum ib_cma_event {
> IB_CMA_EVENT_ESTABLISHED = 1,
> IB_CMA_EVENT_REJECTED,
> IB_CMA_EVENT_NON_PEER_REJECTED,
> IB_CMA_EVENT_DISCONNECTED,
> IB_CMA_EVENT_UNREACHABLE
> };
Why not make REJECTED mean NON_PEER_REJECTED and add a PEER_REJECTED?
In other words:
enum ib_cma_event {
IB_CMA_EVENT_ESTABLISHED = 1,
IB_CMA_EVENT_REJECTED,
IB_CMA_EVENT_PEER_REJECTED,
IB_CMA_EVENT_DISCONNECTED,
IB_CMA_EVENT_UNREACHABLE
};
In my opinion this makes the hierarchy clearer. There are general
rejections and specific peer rejections.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
