On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 12:32, Sean Hefty wrote: > I don't think that they need to deal with caching. And in looking at the > ib_at > code, I think that caching should be removed.
Just for clarity: There is only a placeholder for caching in the AT API. Nothing has been implemented. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
