Hi Viswa, On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 15:55, Viswanath Krishnamurthy wrote: > Here is the log of osmtest failure. This was seen 150 times out of > 2500 iterations. The opensm SUBNET UP failure is tough to reproduce. > Saw it once in 2500 iterations. Unfortunately I did not collect the > log on that error.
I understand but it is hard to know whether this is a known issue or something else without a log of the failure. > The patch worked as expected and did not see any issues with ctrl-C. > When I tried apply the patch, I got a failure. (I used the patch > command). I manually added those 2 lines. Not sure why the patch wouldn't apply. > Command Line Arguments > Done with args > Flow = All Validations > Sep 21 17:50:56 684254 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr: > assign CA mthca0 port 1 guid (0x2c90200400cfd) as the def > ault port. > using default guid 0x2c90200400cfd > Sep 21 17:50:56 686301 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr: > assign CA mthca0 port 1 guid (0x2c90200400cfd) as the def > ault port. > Sep 21 17:50:56 686347 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port > 0x2c90200400cfd. > Sep 21 17:50:56 689963 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr: > assign CA mthca0 port 1 guid (0x2c90200400cfd) as the def > ault port. > Sep 21 17:50:56 691969 [B7F026C0] -> osm_vendor_get_all_port_attr: > assign CA mthca0 port 1 guid (0x2c90200400cfd) as the def > ault port. > Sep 21 17:50:56 693187 [B7F026C0] -> > osmtest_validate_sa_class_port_info: > ----------------------------- > SA Class Port Info: > base_ver:1 > class_ver:2 > cap_mask:0x202 > resp_time_val:0x64 > ----------------------------- > Sep 21 17:50:56 775383 [B7F026C0] -> osmtest_wrong_sm_key_ignored: Try > PortRecord for port with LID 0x0 Num:0x1. > Sep 21 17:51:00 775320 [B76FFBB0] -> umad_receiver: ERR 5409: send > completed with error (method=1 attr=12 trans_id=0x34) -- > dropping. > Sep 21 17:51:00 775389 [B76FFBB0] -> umad_receiver: ERR 5410: class > 0x3 LID 0x0 > Sep 21 17:51:00 775418 [B76FFBB0] -> osmtest_query_res_cb: ERR 0003: > Error on query (IB_TIMEOUT). > Sep 21 17:51:00 775465 [B7F026C0] -> osmtest_wrong_sm_key_ignored: ERR > 0011: Did not get a timeout but got (IB_SUCCESS). > Sep 21 17:51:00 775581 [B7F026C0] -> osmt_register_service: > Registering Service: name:osmt.srvc.1804289383.7793 id:0x6b8b26f > 6. > Sep 21 17:51:00 777143 [B7F026C0] -> osmt_register_service: > Registering Service: name:osmt.srvc.846930885.7793 id:0x327b0554 > Sep 21 17:51:00 777143 [B7F026C0] -> osmt_register_service: > Registering Service: name:osmt.srvc.846930885.7793 id:0x327b0554 > . > Sep 21 17:51:04 779578 [B76FFBB0] -> umad_receiver: ERR 5409: send > completed with error (method=2 attr=31 trans_id=0x36) --dropping. > Sep 21 17:51:04 779604 [B76FFBB0] -> umad_receiver: ERR 5410: class > 0x3 LID 0x0 > Sep 21 17:51:04 779631 [B76FFBB0] -> osmtest_query_res_cb: ERR 0003: > Error on query (IB_TIMEOUT). > Sep 21 17:51:04 779674 [B7F026C0] -> osmt_register_service: ERR 0364: > ib_query failed (IB_TIMEOUT). > Sep 21 17:51:04 779740 [B7F026C0] -> osmtest_run: ERR 00148: Service > Flow failed (IB_TIMEOUT) > OSMTEST: TEST "All Validations" FAIL The final FAIL/PASS is definitive so there are real failures here. Is this consistent or intermittent ? Does this work sometimes or always fail ? -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
