On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Sean Hefty wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote: > > Guy> But the main question is: does openib wants to support ATS > > Guy> arp ? do we also want to support ATS > > Guy> registration/deregistration ? openib can support, for > > Guy> example, only the ATS arp and rely on the openib-less targets > > Guy> to do their own registrations. > > > > I would certainly prefer to forget all about ATS in every form. > > That is my preference as well. I believe that we want to support address > translation using ARP, but not ATS as defined by SA service registration and > queries. I think creating a new address resolution module to address the needs of the CMA API is fine. However, ATS is needed for interoperability with existing kDAPL and uDAPL installations. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
