My understanding is that the refcnt will still need to be held (even after this change) even if SDP would not poke at IPoIB's private data. Is that true?
Moreover there was discussion about getting this data from the CM REQ private data. So, what is the exact rationale for adding this to the
net_device structure?
Pradeep
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/03/2005 02:50:21 PM:
> On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 17:35, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Hal> We will have this shortly. I have been waiting for this to
> > Hal> propose the changes to SDP et al.
> >
> > OK, but I don't think it makes sense to merge this upstream until
> > there is in-tree code that will use it.
>
> I wanted to get this in so I could add the code to IPoIB to use this so SDP
> and others no longer poke at IPoIB's private data. This is a small
> change. Should this change be made locally (in OpenIB) first (and we'll
> have our own modified netdevice.h for a short time) ?
>
> -- Hal
>
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
>
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
