Hi again Yael, On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 03:53, Yael Kalka wrote: > > > I decided to remove the checking for zero in the atomic_dec after > all, > > > since as I mentioned before - clearing it is not a fix, and we > will > > > see the value in other infos in the log file. > > > > But there is danger is these counters wrap, right ? > > > There is still some danger - as you noted - the counters can wrap. > This will happen if there is some problem in the lower layer. > For example - if we get the same mad twice, and we allocated it > already for another request (after getting the first answer). > It shouldn't happen if the lower layer is functioning correctly.
I think that it's more than lower layer malfunction that can cause this to occur. -- Hal _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
