> -----Original Message----- > From: Roland Dreier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 2:53 PM > To: Kanevsky, Arkady > Cc: Roland Dreier; Yaron Haviv; [email protected]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: iWARP emulation protocol > > > The proposal doesn't talk about mapping from TCP port numbers into a > 16-bit range of IB service IDs. I think this is necessary. >
I agree, that's part of the other proposals > Also, putting the destination address in the REP message doesn't make > sense to me. The destination IP and port number is something that the > initiator of the connection is sending to the destination, not the > other way around. The passive side of the connection (receiver of the > REQ) needs the destination IP as part of the REQ so that it can decide > whether to accept the connection; the active side (sender of the REQ) > knows who it is trying to talk to, so having the address information > in the REP is not useful. Also Agree, REP just needs few fields (ver, capabilities) Yaron _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
