Kanevsky, Arkady wrote:
I will update the proposal for IBTA based on this feedback and all other feedback posted. I will still separate private data usage proposal and port mapping one.
Again, I think that these should be in the same proposal. The CM REQ carries the IB transport layer address. The goal here is to map another transport layer address to the IB one. The source port is included in the private data. By not including the destination port, there's an assumption that it's provided somewhere else in the CM REQ. We should either make this explicit, or put the destination port in the private data as well.
- Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
