> From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 10:25 AM > > If we use an IBTA assigned service ID, I think that this can be > defined without using a reserved bit or changing a version number. > The two possible implementations that I see are using a single > service ID, or mapping port numbers to a range of assigned service > IDs.
I would personally rather see a reserved bit get used. Imagine a system that has two protocols installed that use IP addressing. That system might want to have different apps listening on the same port number over both, even though the protocols are different. Having a reserved bit in the REQ indicate the presence of IP addressing information (including source and destination port numbers) in the private data seems most flexible to me. - Fab _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
