Hi Woody, * On Oct,2 Woodruff, Robert J<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > Arlin wrote, > >James, > > >Here is a patch to add an optional openIB uDAPL provider that uses the > socket CM >for anyone having > >problems scaling out with the uCM/uAT version. To build the new > provider, simply >"make > >VERBS=openib_scm". This version does not require IPoIB, uCM, or uAT. > > >-arlin > > I have been using this DAPL provider with my testing of MPI and > it seems stable. It has been tested up to 128 nodes. > The uAT version on the other hand seems to still have problems > so I would be glad to see this version be put into the tree also. > > Sayantan, you may also want to try this socket based CM > uDAPL provide for your work. It seems more stable than the uAT version > in my testing thus far.
Thanks for this information! We will try this out in our lab. Sincerely, Sayantan. -- http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~surs _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
