> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Tucker > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:56 PM > To: Kanevsky, Arkady > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [openib-general] round 2 - proposal for socket > based connection model > > Arkady: > > I may actually have a constructive comment about the protocol > (private data format). One thing I noticed is that *almost* > everything in the private data header is available in the > native iWARP protocol header except the ZB and SI bits. If > these bits become part of the canonical private data header, > then does that require an iWARP transport to use the header > too even though only two bits are useful? > > Sorry if this is a dumb question, >
I'm not sure I followed why these were needed myself. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
