> Has anyone purchased IB SRP target and for use with linux?
> I've seen references to "Cisco SFS 3001 Multifabric Server Switch"
> (TS90) with the optional FC gateway stuff.
Yes, we have actually sold some...
> Are any native IB/SRP native storage devices available?
I don't know what the release status of the various products are, but
Data Direct, Engenio and Mellanox have all talked about native IB/SRP
targets, and judging by John Kingman's activity, it's a safe bet that
StorageGear has something cooking as well.
> Implies the driver hasn't changed since Jan 11. Is that correct?
Nope, I bumped it to 0.2 and put it in the modinfo.
> I'd add "initiator" here unless you think this driver could
> support targets in the future too.
It's definitely an initiator, so I changed that.
> Don't need the NULL assignment here.
Fixed.
> Could this be "adjusted" to read:
> if (ret = PTR_ERR(target->qp)) {
> ...
>
> I'm sure I do NOT understand the utility of "IS_ERR" in this case.
> Most uses of "IS_ERR" seem superfluous.
I don't think this sort of change will work. IS_ERR() is only true if
the pointer (as an unsigned long) is in the range -1000L ... -1L. But
PTR_ERR() will be true if the pointer is non-NULL.
> There are still 6 "XXX" markers...don't want to suggest they need
> to be fixed.
I fixed the easy ones...
> Are these retry counts specified by some standard or just
> "this ought to be enough" kind of numbers?
> If the latter, another "XXX" about making them system tunables
> (e.g. MOD_PARM or /sys) would be good.
Nope, no spec. I added a comment talking about this issue.
> Is it explained somplace why we drop the old cm_id and create
> a new one in this case?
> I'm hoping this was explained elsewhere and I just missed it.
Yes, a few lines earlier:
/*
* Now get a new local CM ID so that we avoid confusing the
* target in case things are really fouled up.
*/
> > + while (ib_poll_cq(target->cq, 1, &wc) > 0)
> > + ; /* nothing */
> does a "relax_cpu()" belong in here?
I don't think so. No entries can be added to the CQ while we're in
that loop -- I just want to go through the CQ and throw away any of
the entries that are there. So it's not busy-waiting -- it's just
iterating through the queue until it drains it.
Thanks,
Roland
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
