Sean> I have no problem moving this. If the declaration goes in
Sean> ib_verbs.h, should the function just go in verbs.c (or a new
Sean> file) and be included as part of ib_core? It just seems a
Sean> little off to me to implement functions declared in a single
Sean> header file in separate modules.
We can easily create a new header for these declaration. That's
probably the cleanest thing to do, although I can't come up with a
very good name for it right now, though....
Sean> Also, I'll need to do this with a path record as well. I
Sean> can either include the routine as part of ib_sa, add a new
Sean> module, ib_user_sa, or drop that call into one of the
Sean> existing ib_user_* modules.
If it's just marshalling between user and kernel formats, I'd stick it
in uverbs_marshall.c. But if there's going to be something
substantial then maybe it make sense to create a user SA module.
- R.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
