> -----Original Message----- > From: Woodruff, Robert J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:10 PM > To: Ranjit Pandit > Cc: Caitlin Bestler; Fab Tillier; Sean Hefty; Rick Frank; > Matt L. Leininger; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [openib-general] [ANNOUNCE] > ContributeRDS(ReliableDatagramSockets) to OpenIB > > >To put the improvement in perspective: > > And if RDS were implemented over a connectionless QP, the QP > savings are even more... > > Procs per node uDapl/Sdp Rds/connection oriented > RDS/conectionless > 2 19996 9999 1 > 4 39984 9999 1 > > Of coarse, connectionless would require the reliability to be > done in S/W in addition to the demuxing of packets. > > woody > >
It would also require the application to do SAR for all packets that are larger than the PMTU. One of the benefits of trying to ride on the SOCK_DGRAM interface is that it already defines a larger guaranteed message size. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
