SCTP is connection based - we have many dependencies on our connectionless datagram model.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Rimmer, Todd'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Caitlin Bestler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Rick Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Pandit, Ranjit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Grant Grundler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 6:10 PM
Subject: RE: [openib-general] [ANNOUNCE] Contribute RDS(ReliableDatagramSockets) to OpenIB


Todd wrote,
This would miss the second major improvement of RDS, namely removing the
need for >the application to perform timeouts and retries on datagram
packets.  If Oracle
ran over UDP/IP/IPoIB it would not be guaranteed a loss-less reliable
interface.  >If UDP/IP/IPoIB provided a loss-less reliable interface it
would likely break or >affect other UDP applications which are expecting a
flow controlled interface.

Todd Rimmer

Then use SCTP instead of UDP, which already provides a loss-less reliable
interface.
If SCTP has problems with the number of endpoints it can currently support,
why not just fix that problem and fix IpoIB to use a connected model to
increase performance, rather than inventing a completly new protocol and/or
address family.

Just a thought.

woody






_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to