Hi Roland, If you only got single 24port switch you should only see 1 record with base lid = 0 and port num = 2. But maybe we have a bug not comparing port num.
On our test today we have seen only one record for port 2 from each switch (we had two switches so got 2 recodrs). Could you dump out the content of the PortRecords that you get as response? Eitan Zahavi Design Technology Director Mellanox Technologies LTD Tel:+972-4-9097208 Fax:+972-4-9593245 P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL > -----Original Message----- > From: Roland Dreier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 5:21 PM > To: Yael Kalka > Cc: Eitan Zahavi; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [openib-general] SRP device management client (and a few opensm > glitches) > > Yael> Hello Roland, When turning on only the comp_mask for the > Yael> local_port_num you will get all relevant PortInfo records > Yael> from the switches. These records do have many fields zeroed > Yael> out (e.g subnet_prefix), but they are still valid records. > Yael> Is this what you are seeing? > > I guess the bug is related, because in my test fabric which has a > single 24-port switch chip, I see 24 entries with a zero base_lid and > a local_port_num of 2. > > - R. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
