Doug Ledford wrote, >The suggestion from Bob Woodruff was to use the verbs-cm support since >kDAPL isn't included in the kernel.
Yes, for now I would suggest to use the socket CM version of uDAPL. Arlin is starting to debug the CMA version, but for now the socket CM version of uDAPL seems stable. We ran it on a 128 node cluster in Dupont for SC'05 with no problems. For example, to build and install the socket CM version of uDAPL on a Red Hat EL 4.0 kernel, from the userspace directory, cd dapl/dapl/udapl make VERBS=openib_scm cp -f ./Target/libdapl.a /usr/local/lib/libdapl-openib.a cp -f ./Target/libdapl.so /usr/local/lib/libdapl-openib.so cd ../../dat/udat make OS_VENDOR=REDHAT_EL4 cp -f ./Target/x86_64/libdat.a /usr/lib64 cp -f ./Target/x86_64/libdat.so /usr/lib64 Not sure why we needed the REDHAT_EL4 option on building libdat.so, but Arlin Davis can provide details if needed. woody _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
