agreed. Arkady Kanevsky email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Appliance Inc. phone: 781-768-5395 275 Totten Pond Rd. Fax: 781-895-1195 Waltham, MA 02451-2010 central phone: 781-768-5300
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:59 PM > To: Yaron Haviv > Cc: Kanevsky, Arkady; Ted H. Kim; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [swg] RE: [openib-general] socket based > connectionmodel for IBproposal -round 4 > > Yaron Haviv wrote: > > How about using ARP to get from IP to DGID+Partition Followed by an > > SIDR to map DGID+PKey+Service to QKey & QP > > > > It is the same concept as CMA that first uses IP stack (ARP > etc') to > > get to the remote end-point (in that case GID+PKey combination) > > followed by SA-PR and CM REQ, we just substitute the CM REQ with a > > SIDR REQ It may not solve all the cases but probably most of the > > practical ones > > This was my thought as well. > > > Anyway the packets will need to carry some header (since it's not a > > connected model), you can add more stuff in that header > (e.g. can use > > IPoIB header as is which contains already the src/dst IP) > > I was assuming that each packet would need to carry some sort > of header. > > At this point, we may want to defer defining anything for UDP > until there's a better understanding of what an application > would want. My guess is that such an application will need > new APIs for posting sends based on UDP addressing. > > - Sean > _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
