Quoting Dan Bar Dov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I understand that SDP needs address translation services as well as > its own private data.
SDP is an exception simply because it was there first. > However, I think it could be implemented using > optional API functions that allow the ULP to modify the private data > per its need, rather than adding ULP knowledge into CMA. I agree this would also work, but I like the existing API better. Hopefully, the simple way in which its being implemented will help drive new ULP authors to follow the uniform spec rather than override it :) > As example, if ISER spec will be modified, or some new ULP > implemented, that needed their own private data, we'll need to modify > CMA again, as well as creating a dependency between CMA versions and > ULPs. What do you mean by "CMA versions"? -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
