Hi Sean I am still confused about the exact requirement. But the reference is: osm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
The rest of the queries are handled by osm_sa_*.c (but not the code in _ctrl.c). osm_sa_class_port_info.c osm_sa_response.c osm_sa_node_record.c osm_sa_service_record.c osm_sa_informinfo.c osm_sa_path_record.c osm_sa_slvl_record.c osm_sa_lft_record.c osm_sa_lft_record_ctrl.c osm_sa_sminfo_record.c osm_sa_link_record.c osm_sa_pkey_record.c osm_sa_vlarb_record.c osm_sa_mad_ctrl.c osm_sa_portinfo_record.c osm_sa_mcmember_record.c Eitan Zahavi Design Technology Director Mellanox Technologies LTD Tel:+972-4-9097208 Fax:+972-4-9593245 P.O. Box 586 Yokneam 20692 ISRAEL > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:40 PM > To: Hal Rosenstock > Cc: Eitan Zahavi; openib > Subject: Re: [openib-general] SA cache design > > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > I would view that the database is an SADB with the actual pathrecords as > > one example rather than the SMDB from which they are calculated. I think > > Sean is interested in the SA packet query/response code here so avoid > > recreating this and that the backend would be stripped out. Sean, is > > that accurate ? > > Hal is correct. > > - Sean _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
