On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:34:35PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: ... > Donnu :) > Is this working on SP2?
I'm pretty sure SP2 is the current SLES9 release. Likely it will have compile issues in a similar/same way. I haven't tried. I've not had time yet to integrated perftests into my regular (montly about) netperf runs. > > SLES9 doesn't support openib drivers - I'm not surprised there > > are compilation problems. > > Naturally, I've replaced the kernel with 2.6.15. > I haven't run into problems, yet. OIC. I'm doing the same thing with Debian. In the past, I've just redirected /usr/include/asm to point at the "raw" linux kernel header files. I haven't needed to do that in quite a while though. > > Yeah, I've been real comfortable including kernel asm files. sorry - should read "I've NOT been...". > > But it was the most portable way of getting the cycle counts. > > If you feel strongly about it, I don't mind getting rid of > > this dependency. > > Yeah. FWIW I still plan to keep > > #else > #warning get_cycles not implemented for this architecture: attempt asm/timex.h > #include <asm/timex.h> > #endif Ok. That'll work as well as it works now then. And this is open source. Folks can still add new arches if asm/timex.h doesn't work for them. thanks, grant _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
