On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:22 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > Jean-Christophe> I bet it is a frequently asked question, but not > Jean-Christophe> one that I found answered so far. May be just > Jean-Christophe> posting a "safe-bet" revision number on the main > Jean-Christophe> page would be good enough. (or is always going to > Jean-Christophe> be "HEAD" :-) ?) > > In general, our goal is that the head of the svn tree is the best > subversion revision. > Thanks. That's the way I like it too :-)
However, such a policy is not without its own set of issues. The one that caused me to ask the question in the first place is this: The folks at openmpi did publish a stable release which compiled splendidly against the libs installed by openib-userspace-svn3640-1.x86_64.rpm (thanks to the contributor, btw). But as soon as I installed openib's latest and greatest, a change of API caused openmpi to fail to compile. :-( Oh well, hopefully I'll get around that by grabbing the bleeding edge from openmpi as well. Or is it reasonable to try and leave the userspace stuff alone and update only the k code ? -- Jean-Christophe Hugly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PANTA _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
