Quoting Jean-Christophe Hugly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: Error when loading ib_umad > > On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 07:07 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Are you ignoring compile warnings about class_device_create()? Since > > 2.6.15 is out, the OpenIB svn does not support 2.6.14 any more, so you > > may run into problems like this. > > > > You will probably need to restore the compatibility hack removed in > > r4784 by adding something like > > > > #include <linux/version.h> > > > > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,15) > > #define class_device_create(cls, parent, devt, device, fmt, arg...) \ > > class_device_create(cls, devt, device, fmt, ## arg) > > #endif > > > > to <rdma/ib_verbs.h>. > > Thanks a bunch. Since I'm just the 3rd guy hitting that, may be a little > addition to the backport set of patches is in order.
Yes, thats now under https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/backport/2.6.14 > I do not mind > generating it, but I am not sure of the correct procedure: the patches > are grouped by reason, but they could overlap (in that case it would) > should they be grouped by affected file instead ? Or is there a way to > specify in which order they should be applied ? Whoever maintains these > BP patches might have some recommendation to make. If you are talking about the patches under https://openib.org/svn/gen2/branches/backport I'm being careful to make them independent. You'll be able to apply in whatever order (possibly with a fuzz). -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
