On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 11:49 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 11:34 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote: > > > Here was the suggestion that I received as a change to the license: > > > > licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU General > > Public License (GPL) Version 2, available from the file COPYING in the main > > directory of this source tree, or, when using this code outside the context > > of > > the linux kernel or other GPL works, the OpenIB.org BSD license below > > > > The differences between this version and the one used by OpenIB is slight, > > but > > it does clarify that the version in Linux is GPL, which is the case. > > That seems reasonable to me. Arjan?
To me it's a very good clarification of the situation and avoids a situation where people get the wrong idea. So I'm all for it. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
