Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: Userspace testing results (many kernels,many svn trees) > > On 09.01.2006 [08:33:01 +0200], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting r. Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Just like with the results I posted earlier, all the perftest results > > > are seriously wrong for 32-bit clients (with both 32-bit and 64-bit > > > servers). I am not sure who else to notify beyond the general list (is > > > there a corresponding MAINTAINERS files like in the kernel proper for > > > the OpenIB code?) > > > > That would be me - sorry about the delay, I'll take a look at this. > > Thanks a lot, Nishanth! > > This work is very much appreciated. > > No worries, hope the problem is not too hard to fix :)
OK, I'm going to concentrate on rdma_lat/rdma_bw for now. # file ./rdma_bw ./rdma_bw: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped # ./rdma_bw swlab155 local address: LID 0xd9, QPN 0x24040a, PSN 0x98e7f4 RKey 0xe0003f VAddr 0x000000556db000 remote address: LID 0xd9, QPN 0x240406, PSN 0x952ea0, RKey 0xe00033 VAddr 0x000000556db000 Bandwidth peak (#0 to #999): 879.956 MB/sec Bandwidth average: 879.954 MB/sec Service Demand peak (#0 to #999): 3773 cycles/KB Service Demand Avg : 37 cycles/KB Seems like I cant reproduce the problem. Which distribution and CPU architecture is this, again? -- MST _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
