Tom> BTW, along these lines, does anyone have commentary on the Tom> netevent registration patch?
It looks reasonable to me, although I'm not sure what the netdev people will think about scattering notifier calls around the tree. There's certainly a maintainability cost in terms of requiring those calls to be kept in sync with how neighbours change. Also changes to net/ipv6 were conspicuous in their absence. Does your patch only handle ipv4? Tom> To avoid the impression that this patch falls under the Tom> "using IB to get stuff into netdev that would be vetoed Tom> otherwise", I am happy to submit a patch to netdev directly Tom> to avoid sullying OpenIB's good name. It's not just sullying a good name -- it's respect for maintainers. We can't merge new functionality into net/ without buy-in from netdev and Dave Miller. - R. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general