[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Sean Hefty wrote:
>
>> Index: include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- include/rdma/ib_verbs.h (revision 5098)
>> +++ include/rdma/ib_verbs.h (working copy)
>> @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ union ib_gid {
>> };
>>
>> enum ib_node_type {
>> - IB_NODE_CA = 1,
>> + IB_NODE_IB = 0x10, /* mask for all IB node types */
>
> Is is time to update the prefix to RDMA_ (e.g. RDMA_NODE_IB)?
>
I would say that symbols that are IB specific are very
low priority for shifting to transport neutral names.
Unless the goal is to eliminate the use of the IB_ prefix
completely I would not bother. It's more important that
the symbols that transport neutral code would use not
have the "IB_" or "ib_" prefixes.
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
