Sean Hefty wrote:
Or >> Aren't we creating a monster here??? if this is SA replica which should Or >> work for scale from day one, lets call it this way and see how to reach there

The cache update window is configurable.
...
Based on information from SilverStorm, the cache should work well in practice.

I recall that SilverStorm mentioned they had a well working SA replica, but when i look on the naked math for 1k nodes and the hard to reach in real life uniform distribution of queries over time, i really can't see how to reach it unless you practically never update the cache and you have magically caused your SM/SA to survive the one and only session of those 1k get table queries (again 350 mad/sec, so many concurrent rmpp sessions etc etc).

+ neither MVAPICH nor OpenMPI are using path query

The national labs want all path records for their routing algorithms.  I

So your understanding they have an --all to all- 1k ranks IB app that needs to know for each node all the paths to other nodes? if the case is 1k IB app where each rank connects to (say log2(1k)=) 10 ranks then each rank needs all the paths to those 10 other nodes.

> I believe that the problems here were API issues that make connecting
> difficult.  As a result, most applications just hard-coded everything.

I guess feedback from MPI people telling whether they have plans to use path query would help us to see where we actually stand.

Or.



_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to