On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 13:56, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 10:55, Roland Dreier wrote: > > The current code probably needs to be extended to give > > the upper layers the port number where a MAD was received, and also to > > make it possible to specify the port number that a directed route MAD > > will be sent on. > > On the receive side, the port_num is part of the WC for DR SMPs. > On the send side, the port_num is part of the WR (for DR SMPs). > So at least that part is covered as far as I can tell.
While this is supported, one issue is that in order to obtain the port_num on the send side, the optional ib_query_ah must be implemented as the ib_mad_send_buf only contains an ah and not a port_num. Is there a better way to handle this ? -- Hal > There are some changes I can see and of course, the SMI has not been > exercised for switch forwarding so there could be some issues there. > > -- Hal > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
