Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Plans for libibverbs 1.0, 1.1 and beyond > > I thought it might be helpful to give an informal roadmap of my plans > for libibverbs. As I said, I hope to have a libibverbs 1.0 release > out in three weeks or so. Once that happens, I plan to do 1.0.x > maintenance releases "as needed."
One thing that might be important is to use the upcoming madvise(MADV_DONTFORK) on private CQ/QP work request ring buffers. This would require allocating these from page-sized pools. > I'm also thinking of moving my libibverbs and libmthca development > trees to git (most likely hosted at kernel.org). This has the > drawback of moving their development repositories out of the common > openib.org svn tree. However, it will make handling 1.0, 1.1 and > feature development branches much easier. I'd like to hear opinions > on this before I make a decision. Well, since you ask, I am pretty happy with how things work with svn. Do you expect sufficient development on branches that needs advanced merging that git provides? I would think we just need an occasional bugfix there, which should be easy to handle by plain patches. Hopefully we'll just have a development trunk and stable branches, not development branches. -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
