Quoting r. Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: Plans for libibverbs 1.0, 1.1 and beyond > > Christoph> we also currently prefer svn for the 1.0 release. At > Christoph> some point we'll have to backport bugfixes to the 1.0 > Christoph> release found in a later development version. Having > Christoph> to do that at all isn't really fun, but having to keep > Christoph> some of that code in "sort of" sync between different > Christoph> repositories is even more difficult. > > There seems to be some confusion here. There would only ever be one > libibverbs repository. The only question is whether it remains in svn > or moves to a different SCM. > > In fact moving to git would make porting patches between different > branches far easier.
I think the claim is that it's awkward to use different tools to get different components. Related question: can git support working on just the infiniband subdirectory of a tree? Thats important e.g. for people that only want to work on the infiniband stuff against the last stable kernel. -- Michael S. Tsirkin Staff Engineer, Mellanox Technologies _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
